Thread:Love and Krieg/@comment-25044566-20140901223304

Just... a few. You have no idea how many complains i'm getting from you. 4/5 of my PMs are about ya, and I got hundreds.

I don't hate you, I believe your a great wikia mod, but this is starting to overwhelm me.

I need to unmod you for a few days and see if they chill down, I can't even see normal PMs anymore.

Look at this huge ass PM, it's one from the many:

As much as I hate illiterate proletariats, I hate Kreig even more, especially when he tries to make polyloquent, grotty Huns out to be something they're not. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what his particularly shambolic form of Lysenkoism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of undiplomatic politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution. He's afflicted with what I call Ageism Addiction Disorder. Symptoms include loss of control, craving and withdrawal symptoms, social isolation, excessive financial debt, and an insatiable desire to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats. The only known cure is for Kreig to admit that his announcements are sheer idiocy. For proof of this fact I must point out that he loves generating drama and conflict. That's why Kreig repeatedly insists that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't. It's also why he believes in impinging upon our daily lives. Kreig's agendas are becoming increasingly shameless. They have already begun to let us know exactly what our attitudes should be towards various types of people and behavior. Now fast-forward a few years to a time in which they have enabled Kreig to pursue an insipid agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever. If you don't want such a time to come then help me investigate Kreig's feral principles, ideals, and objectives. Help me outline Kreig's troubling pattern of lying, incompetence, and carelessness. Please keep in mind that I refuse to indulge his foibles. Kreig's squibs are so tetchy that if allowed to go unanswered, their final cost would be incalculable. By Kreig's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you're definitely a haughty, fatuous scofflaw. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from his. For instance, I undeniably allege that Kreig has one-upped George Washington in that he cannot tell a lie and cannot tell the truth. Basically, he's too sanctimonious to distinguish between the two. You may not understand this now, and I don't fault you for that, but Kreig has blood on his hands. Naturally, he pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If Kreig really had our best interests at heart, he wouldn't feed information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly impetuous agendas. He is not only immoral but amoral. After hearing about Kreig's disrespectful attempts to brainwash the masses into submission, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. Kreig recently made the astonishing claim that he's a tribune of the oppressed. Stripped of all its hyperbole, this statement is really just saying that Kreig says that society is screaming for his annunciations. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that he blames our current woes on everyone but himself. Now I could go off on that point alone, but it's easy to tell if he's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying. To believe that Kreig is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread is to deceive ourselves. Are we going to step back and let Kreig portray the most boisterous autocrats you'll ever see as perjurers? I can tell you this: I will be speaking out—every day and everywhere—to make sure that we do not. He maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around him. There's a word for that: libel. It is well known that his secret police back away from any negative press about his philosophies as if it were a rattlesnake encountered unexpectedly on a nature trail. But my current plan is to put an end to his evildoing. Yes, Kreig will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but if he gets his way, none of us will be able to demonstrate conclusively that you cannot suppose that Kreig would have the slightest compunction about ordering his cringers to assuage the hungers of his slaves with servings of fresh scapegoats. Therefore, we must not let Kreig distort and trivialize the debate surrounding particularism. Kreig keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his “cause” is to advocate illogical endeavors. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, once you understand Kreig's plaints, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Kreig con us into sawing off the very tree limbs upon which we're sitting. We must fight for our freedom of speech. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own headlong doctrines. Kreig shouldn't extirpate the very things that I cherish. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate his treatises are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. Obviously, somebody has to champion the force of goodness against the greed of what I call lubricious tightwads. That somebody can be you. In any case, Kreig extricates himself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice. If I said that violence and prejudice are funny, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being thoroughly honest if I said that there is no doubt that he will promote his perfidious substitute for morality, which defines as shabby any attempt to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be, in the near future. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that this is a free country, and I, hardheaded cynic that I am, contend we ought to keep it that way. This is no laughing matter. Think I'm exaggerating? Just ask any of the most valuable members of our community and they'll all tell you how no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how Kreig makes it a point to impale us on the pike of pharisaism. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also evaluate the tactics he has used against me. Kreig thinks that anyone who dares to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. This is a fixed and false (i.e., delusional) belief that will lead to his doing the entire country a grave disservice in a lustrum or two. I don't know if we can cure Kreig of this intrusive belief, but I do know that he expects us to behave like passive sheep. The only choice Kreig believes we should be allowed to make for ourselves is whether to head towards his slaughterhouse at a trot or at a gallop. He doubtlessly doesn't want us choosing to bring him to justice. In short, Kreig's atavistic values lead him to sentence more and more people to poverty, prison, and early death. As I end this latter thinking you've read it all I'm going to recommend you "demote" Kreig. He is a spammer and a troll on the wiki.

bet you tl;dr, lol.

Ikr your doing your job but i'm getting too overwhelmed with complains about you.

It's just for a few days, man. 