Board Thread:R2D - General Discussion/@comment-25532392-20150123071246/@comment-25532392-20150123084838

Love and Krieg wrote:

DC2002 wrote:

Love and Krieg wrote:

DC2002 wrote:

Love and Krieg wrote:

DC2002 wrote: we need new weapons, right?

but you guys always use the currently existing weapons to compare the new weapons.

For Examples -

if I want a weapon that has more dmg then minigun

you guys will say: "more dmg then mini!!?? too op! no!"

then I want a weapon that has less dmg then minigun, but close to minigun

you guys will say: "it's mp5. how about no."

so I lower the dmg

then you guys will say: "wtf, it's ak "

AND THEN I LOWER THE DMG AGAIN

you guys: "it's thompson. how about no"

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWER THE DMG AGAIN

"Useless."

-

more dmg then minigun = too op, can't.

less dmg then minigun = currently existing weapons, can't.

We will never have new weapons. We say that because we don't need a clone of a same weapon occupying space. so we will never have new weapons. We just got the mp5 then we got no new weapons.

cuz we already have:

minigun  = about 50 dmg

mpg5 = 40 dmg

ak = about 30 dmg

thompson = 20 dmg

dmg > 50 = op, can't

dmg <20 = useless, can't

gg ak/tommy has a large gap to mini

mp5 is first auto secondary with decent stats so it must cost a lot. It is practically a secondary ak. so we need a 40 dmg primary weapon.

and that's m249